Aims and objectives
- To introduce the variety and scope of ancient philosophy within its historical and cultural context.
- To introduce current techniques of philosophical analysis.
- To enable students to evaluate sympathetically philosophical positions and arguments with which they may not agree.
- To sketch the importance of classical philosophy for the entire Western intellectual tradition.
Scope and structure of the examination paper 2017–18
The paper will be divided into two sections. Section A will contain in the region of 7 questions on the set text (currently: Plato, Republic 473c11–535a1). Section B will contain questions (to give a total in the region of 20 in all) covering topics falling within each of the following four areas:
- Early Greek philosophy on principles, being, and change.
- Plato’s views on psychology as developed in such dialogues as Republic, Protagoras, Phaedrus and Timaeus.
- Aristotle - soul, causes, happiness, and the Categories.
- Stoics, Epicureans, and sceptics on the good life, knowledge, and fate.
Candidates will be expected to answer three questions of which at least one, and not more than two, must be from Section A.
PARMENIDES TO DEMOCRITUS
MR N DENYER
Parmenides’ poem denies the possibility of ‘what is not’, and therefore, he thinks, also of any change and plurality. We will begin by examining Parmenides’ argument, perhaps the earliest Greek example of sustained deductive reasoning. We will continue by looking at the arguments that Zeno devised to show that those who rejected Parmenides’ argument were committed to no less paradoxical claims about the possibility of plurality and motion. Then we will consider responses to Parmenides by later philosophers who wanted to revive the business of cosmology, in particular Empedocles, Anaxagoras, and Democritus. We will consider how these thinkers approached questions such as the nature of reality and the possibility of humans acquiring knowledge of it.
It is recommended that you consult A.A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy (1999), J. Warren, Presocratics (2007), and G.S. Kirk, J.E. Raven & M. Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers (1983, 2nd ed.).
PROF. G BETEGH
Dante called him ‘the master of them that know’; Aquinas called him simply ‘the philosopher’; and Plato ‘the mind’. In these necessarily selective lectures we will look at some important highlights from the thought of Aristotle, including the Categories as well as his theories on causes, soul-and-body and happiness. The Part I philosophy experience cannot be complete without an introduction to the deviser of the most comprehensive, systematic and durable philosophy ever known in intellectual history. At the same time, these lectures are also intended to supply important background for those going on to take philosophy papers in Part II. A good way to get a taste before you start is to read Jonathan Barnes, Aristotle: a very short introduction (Oxford University Press), originally in the Past Masters series.
HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN PHILOSOPHY: KNOWLEDGE AND FATE
DR M HATZIMICHALI
This course will consider two sets of fundamental philosophical questions. (1) Can we attain knowledge of the world? If so, how? If not, why not? And what sort of life, if any, could we ever live without knowledge and beliefs? (2) Are our actions really free? Or is everything, including our own deliberations, already determined and fated? In eight lectures we will discuss how the main Hellenistic philosophical schools and tendencies posed (and, in some cases, even devised) these questions and tried to answer them, engaging in an exciting debate in which the rival positions constantly influenced and challenged one other.
These lectures are intended to cover the main material relevant to this part of section B of Paper 8.
Most of the main texts and translations, supplemented by extensive comments, are contained in the two volumes of A.A. Long, D.N. Sedley, The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge: CUP, 1987. You can familiarise yourself with the protagonists of this course by reading at least the introduction of The Hellenistic Philosophers and the relevant sections of The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics (chs. 3, 5, 6, 7), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism (chs. 5 and 8), and The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (chs. 3–6, 7, 8, 11). The monumental The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge: CUP, 1999) contains up to date discussions of most of the themes we will deal with (cf., in particular, chs. 7–11, 14–17).
See also ‘Cicero: Ethics and Politics’ under Part 1B, Paper 6.
PLATO, REPUBLIC 473–535
DR R WARDY
Plato's Republic 473–535 is the central section of the central work by the central figure in the history of philosophy. Republic 473 announces Socrates’ great paradoxical claim: cities and humans generally will never be free from misery until either philosophers become kings or our present rulers become proper philosophers.
The following sixty Stephanus pages introduce a sequence of brilliant arguments and images designed to defend that claim. Along the way we learn what true political expertise involves and how it might be acquired. We also delve into some very basic questions about the nature of reality and knowledge.
The best advance reading is the text itself. For Greek with commentary, use Slings’ OCT and James Adam's old but wonderful two-volume edition (CUP, second, revised, edition, 1963). For a translation use Paul Shorey's Loeb. On account of the dialogue's length, we concentrate on only a selection, albeit the central core; those who read the rest of the Republic, at least in translation, will be exposed to a wealth of additional exciting material, and enjoy a considerable advantage.
EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE
MR N DENYER
The course will discuss the relationship between science and philosophy from Thales to Plato’s Timaeus, based on the relevant fragments of the Presocratic philosophers and sections from Hippocratic treatises. The primary questions will be the following:
- Science and natural philosophy: what is the difference and what difference does it make?
- What were the basic phenomena and explananda in cosomology, astronomy, and medicine?
- What was the role of observation?
- Building models: theoretical models and methods of visualisation.
- The methods of the early Greek mathematicians.
- The early Pythagoreans: lore and/or science.
- The ancient feud between doctors and philosophers.
- Plato’s reaction to early Greek science in the Timaeus.
Advance reading: G.E.R. Lloyd, Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle; R. McKirahan, Philosophy Before Socrates (2nd edition); A.A. Long (ed.), TheCambridgeCompanion to Early Greek Philosophy.
Roman and Greek Philosophy's Influence on Today's Western Culture
780 Words4 Pages
Advances in Art, science and politics were made in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. Greek philosophers were among the first in the West to explore nature in a rational way and to make educated guesses about the creation of the world and the universe. This is why Greece is often referred to as the birthplace of Western culture.
The ancient Greeks viewed the world in a way that one would today perhaps describe as "holistic". Science, philosophy, art and politics were interwoven and combined into one worldview. Moreover, those who look carefully will find subtle, but intelligible parallels between early Greek philosophy and Eastern thought. The Heraclitean fire resembles Buddhist impermanence, while the Greek Logos resembles the…show more content…
Eventually, the Judaic sect we now call Christianity would prevail.
The single most important philosophy in Rome was Stoicism, which originated in Hellenistic Greece. The contents of the philosophy were easily persuaded to the Roman worldview, especially to repeat what the Romans considered their crowning achievement. The centrepiece of Stoic philosophy was the concept of the logos. The universe is ordered by God and this order is the logos, which means ?meaning of the universe?. Rome at its beginning was basically agricultural and martial culture. As a result, the earliest Romans stressed effortlessness, strength, and toughness, which are all requirements of both the agricultural and martial lifestyles.
As an academic discipline, Western political philosophy has its origins in ancient Greek society, when city-states were experimenting with various forms of political organization including monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, and democracy. One of the first, extremely important classical works of political philosophy is Plato's The Republic, which was followed by Aristotle's Politics. Roman political philosophy was influenced by the Stoics, and the Roman statesman Cicero wrote on political philosophy.
Plato developed such distinct areas of philosophy as epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics. His deep influence on Western philosophy is