Gender Diversity Essay

Gender diversity is equitable or fair representation between genders. Gender diversity most commonly refers to an equitable ratio of men and women, but may also include non-binary gender categories.[1]Gender diversity on corporate boards has been widely discussed,[2][3][4] and many ongoing initiatives study and promote gender diversity in fields traditionally dominated by men, including computing, engineering, medicine, and science.[5]

Benefits of gender diversity[edit]

Achieving gender diversity within organizations brings multiple benefits to companies, leading to increased long term profits. The most important benefits are:

Increased financial performance

As diversity within workforce in companies is reaching higher percentages, studies have shown that higher diversity is expected to bring higher returns. Indeed, diversity can now be seen as a sort of “competitive differentiator” that brings about a shift in the market share of a company towards more diverse ones as time passes by. Specifically speaking, thanks to McKinsey’s examinations, it was found that companies that allow for gender diversity within the workplace are 15 percent more prone to experience higher financial returns as compared to the national industry medians.

Moreover, a study conducted by the University of British Columbia demonstrates that women on boards help companies to conclude better M&A deals, reducing their costs by 15.4%.[6][7]

Attraction and Retention of Diversity-Sensible Talents

With a value proposition that promotes gender diversity, companies are more likely to attract talented people that are sensible to the problem and take into consideration gender equality policies when considering different employers.[8]

Better reputation

Gender diversity in companies leads to improved reputation both directly and indirectly. Directly because it’s demonstrated that companies with a higher percentage of women board directors are favorably viewed in sectors that operate close to the final customers and are more likely to be on Ethisphere Institute’s list of the “World’s Most Ethical Companies.

Indirectly because first of all women directors seems to be tougher monitors then men directors and are less likely to commit fraud. Moreover, gender diversity policies seem also to be correlated with increased CSR.[9]

Broader customer base

Since men and women have different viewpoints, ideas, and market insights, a gender-diverse workforce enables better problem solving.

Furthermore, a study done in 2014 by Gallup finds that hiring a gender-diverse workforce allows the company to serve an increasingly diverse customer base. This happens because a gender-diverse workforce eases the process of accessing resources, such as multiple sources of information or credit, and industry knowledge.[10]

Improved decision making processes

Gender diversity in boards increases diversity of ideas by introducing different perspectives and problem-solving approaches. This gives teams increased optionality and decision-making advantages.[11]

New Skills and Management styles

As also found in a recent survey done by RSA, women are considered to ‘’bring empathy and intuition to leadership”, since they have greater awareness of the motivations and concerns of other people. As a matter of facts, 62 per cent of the respondents of the survey stated that women contribute differently in the boardroom, compared to their male colleagues.

A similar proportion saw women as more empathetic, with a better insight into how decisions play out in the wider organisation.” When it came to communications and effective collaboration, “over half felt that women were better”.[12][13]

Measuring gender diversity[edit]

In the boardroom[edit]

Female Chairs

Between Spring 2014 and Spring 2015 there was an increase in the number of female Chairs within the FTSE 100 reports.

Spring 2014 saw 1 Female chair in the FTSE, this increased to 3 by Spring 2015.

Female Chief Executive Officers

The number of Female CEO’s with the FTSE 100 also rose between 2014 and 2015 also increased.

In Spring 2014 the report showed there were 4 female CEOs in the FTSE 100, this increase to 5 by Spring 2015. By 2017, the number of female CEOs among Fortune 500 companies numbered 32 (~6%).[14]

Female Chief Financial Officers

Female CFO’s in the FTSE 100 saw the highest increase.

In Spring 2014 there were 8 female CFO’s in the FTSE 100, this rose to 12 by Spring 2015.

Although rather than 100 companies, this figure was out of 99 due to one company not having the position filled.

In financial markets[edit]

As of 2016, State Street Global Advisors, offers an exchange traded fund (ETF) that tracks companies with relatively high proportions of women in executive and director positions.[15] The ETF follows an index of 185 publicly traded US companies with gender-diverse executive leadership, defined as Senior VP or higher.[15][16] Each company in the index must include at least one woman on its board or as CEO.[16] The fund trades under the symbol and has risen 4.96% in value in its first nine months since inception.[16] In support of addressing systemic gender bias against women in leadership and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) that manifests early in life, the ETF provider has pledged to direct an unknown portion of its revenue to charitable organizations.[17]

In the film industry[edit]

The analysis of The Internet Movie Database (IMDb, 2005 data dump) shows how wide the gender gap is in the film industry, especially for the most prestigious types of jobs. There are nearly twice as many actors as actresses in IMDB. Prestigious jobs such as composer, cinematographer, director are respectively 88%, 76%, and 86% male-dominated.[18]

See also[edit]


  1. ^Sharon E. Sytsma (2 February 2006). Ethics and Intersex. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 38–. ISBN 978-1-4020-4313-0. 
  2. ^Taylor, Kate (26 June 2012). The New Case for Women on Corporate Boards: New Perspectives, Increased Profits, Forbes
  3. ^Campbell, Kevin & Antonio Minquez-Vera. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance, Journal of Business Ethics (2008) 83:435-451
  4. ^Clark, Nicola (27 January 2012). Getting Women Into Boardrooms, by Law, The New York Times
  5. ^Blickenstaff, Jacob Clark. "Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?". Gender and Education. 17 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072. 
  6. ^Hunt, Layton, Prince (January 2015). "Why diversity matters". McKinsey. 
  7. ^Kai Li (December 2013). "Women directors get better deals in mergers and acquisitions". UBC Sauder. 
  8. ^"Gender Diversity in Management: targeting untapped talent". Australian Institute of Management. 2012. 
  9. ^"Why diversity matters". Catalyst Information Center. 2013. 
  10. ^S. B. Badal (2014). "The business Benefits of Gender Diversity". Gallup Business Journal. 
  11. ^A. A. Dhir (2015). "Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity: Corporate Law, Governance, and Diversity". Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation. 
  12. ^D. Medland (2012). "Women and the Workplace: The benefits of gender diversity put to the test". Financial Times. N.p.,. 
  13. ^"Gender, Diversity, Leadership & Communication in Organizations". Juan F Ramirez Ferrer. 2015. 
  14. ^Wright, Rob (12 February 2018). "Gender Diversity In Leadership - How Does Biopharma Compare?". Life Science Leader (Blog). Editor's Blog. Retrieved 22 February 2018. 
  15. ^ ab"SHE: The SPDR® SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF"(PDF). State Street Global Advisors. 
  16. ^ abc"Market-Cap Weighted Gender Diversity Index Fund". 
  17. ^"Better Together: Introducing the SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE)"(PDF) (PDF). 2016. 
  18. ^NCYW (May 2014). GendRE & IMDb: An Open Data Analysis of The Film Industry Gender Gap,

Stereotyping: Gender Diversity Essay Sample

By admin In Essay Samples On September 6, 2017

Organization’s need engagement of diverseness in the workplace. which is really necessary. still because there is still gender stereotypes and gender favoritism in the workplace. Stereotype refers to single or specific types of people who have stationary characteristic when people think. As Michael P. ( 2001 ) said. fundamentally. pigeonholing can turn into favoritism if people misunderstand it can be brought in a negative mode. This paper will concern the gender issue affecting pigeonholing in workplace when people are supposed fit common characters and behaviours of peculiar gender. In add-on. holding gender favoritism inclination when stereotype turn into a negative mode in workplace and gender favoritism going a large job in workplace. this paper will considered directors and employees how to confront this job and how to work out it. In the undermentioned lines gender stereotypes and favoritism in workplace will be involved with the aid of literature.

The gender issue affecting pigeonholing in the workplace is when a individual applies an false set of common traits and behaviours of a peculiar gender ; whether it is male or female. to a specific individual based on the cognition of that person’s rank in the gender. Stereotypes may be a negative or positive thing.

Main Body
* Gender stereotypes
1. Definition for Gender Stereotypes
The gender issue affecting pigeonholing in the workplace is when a individual applies an false set of common traits and behaviours of a peculiar gender ; be it male or female. to a specific individual based simply on the cognition of that person’s rank in the gender. Stereotypes may be positive or negative. but it’s the application of those stereotypes that cause menaces to the organization’s substructure. 2. Influences in workplace

Main focused on the negative facets:
1 ) Gender pigeonholing leads to pay favoritism
2 ) Gender pigeonholing leads to ensuing favoritism in employer hiring. fire and promotional patterns. 3 ) Gender pigeonholing besides leads to sexual torment and gestation favoritism. 4 ) Gender pigeonholing ensuing favoritism is still a important barrier to women’s success in the workplace. 3. Example for Gender Stereotype:

Women’s favoritism in work environments still exist even thought there is legislative assembly and tribunals that are supposed to protect against such negative environments. other of import steps must be taken to extinguish the stereotypes. ASDA was pull offing gender diverseness and holding a flexible working agreements of work. * Gender favoritism

1. The construct of Gender favoritism:
Gender favoritism is unequal intervention based on the gender of a individual and refers to any state of affairs where a individual is denied an chance or misjudged entirely on the footing of their sex. ( Mullins. 2007 ) 2. Research: Women’s employment in the UK

Womans now comprise about 47 % of the work force. In 1970s. merely 10 % of professionals were adult females. compared with 42 % today ( EOC. 2006 ) . The chief ground is at that place have been alterations in types of occupations that adult females do. There is an ‘occupational gender segregation’ are used to depict the inclination for work forces and adult females to be employed in different businesss and sectors of the economic system. From the EOC. 2006’s informations that can be known there are three occupational groups that adult females bulk employed. There are ‘administrative and secretarial ( 81 % ) ’ . ‘personal services ( 84 % ) ’ and ‘sales and client service ( 69 % ) ’ . There besides have over half of all employed adult females work in these three occupational groups entirely. Women besides work in low-paid occupation. including receptionists ( 95 % ) . cleaners and house servants ( 76 % ) and waiting staff ( 74 % ) . Whereas. work forces predominate in manual occupations in the skilled trades ( 92 % ) and in ‘process. works and machine operatives’ ( 87 % ) 3. Explain the tendencies in women’s employment from two positions: employers and adult females themselves. Decision

We specialize in writing essays
Forget about that homework for less than $13.90/page

order now


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *